Sermon Notes 30th August
Matthew 16:21-28, Romans 12:9-21 by Chris Lockley
My 6 year old grandson, Elijah, started kindergarten at Alstonville Public School this year.
A few months ago, he told me his class went on a bus trip – around Alstonville. Apparently, it was to teach the children how to behave properly on a bus! As he told me excitedly about the trip, he mentioned going past the castle. I thought he must have meant the Macadamia Castle at Knockrow, but no. It was the castle here in Alstonville. Where is the castle, I asked. Just around the corner from the school. Can anyone guess what the kindergarten kids thought was a castle?
We’re sitting in it! St. Bart’s is the castle! I think it’s delightful that a bunch of 6 year olds exercised their imagination in a creative and fun way. So, I didn’t even consider correcting Elijah’s misunderstanding. Instead. I encouraged it!
I told him about the beloved queen of the castle – from a far-off land – caring for the people with wisdom and kindness, along with the knights of the parish council.
Misunderstandings – from 6 years olds – can be fun and playful. Are there any parts of the Bible you have trouble understanding? That’s – understandable! It’s a very complex, nuanced collection of writings. Even just taking the four gospels, we have stories and sayings – spoken in Aramaic, the everyday language of Jesus’ time, written down 30-70 years after the events in a foreign language – Greek – for specific churches and their situations – translated into modern languages 1,000 plus years later and translated and annotated multiple times reflecting the theological, social and even political preferences of the translators.
There is an alternate view that the Bible is clear and simple: it’s all there in black and white. Black and white thinking usually means a binary outlook: there’s right and wrong, good and bad, truth and error – and nothing in between. That’s one way to understand the term – but it doesn’t leave room for learning from other perspectives or appreciating differing insights.
Let me suggest an alternate form of black and white thinking … from photography.
I recently entered a photo in a quarterly competition on the theme of “Life” in black and white. This is a photo of our magnolia tree that blooms in winter. In colour, the magenta flowers are so vivid that the colour itself becomes the subject. But black and white brings out shape, luminance, contrast, subtlety and texture in ways colour can’t.
Black and white photography is not just about black and white. Often you will find very little pure black and pure white in an image, but many shades of grey.
There is even a standard system which measures 9 zones of grey between the two extremes of pure black and white. A modern camera actual picks up 256 shades of grey!
In this context, “black and white” thinking means anything but binary, either/or thinking. It suggests nuanced, complex thinking – recognising shades of meaning, and subtleties of understanding.
This kind of thinking emerges when we explore the Bible with an open mind. We find multiple levels of meaning. Different people will experience a passage or story in different ways. They will draw out different aspects.
I think it’s fair to say that Jesus was misunderstood by the crowds, by the authorities, even by those closest to him. We see this clearly in today’s – and last week’s – gospel readings. People projected their own priorities and agendas onto Jesus.
Many hoped for an uprising against the Romans. The Messiah could be seen as a nationalistic figure who would lead that. That’s one of the possible reasons why, in last week’s reading, when Peter said Jesus was the Messiah, Jesus told the disciples not to tell anyone about it. He didn’t want the crowds thinking of him like that.
Based on today’s reading it appears Peter may have shared that populist hope and misunderstood what he was saying when he said Jesus was Messiah.
Jesus tells his disciples about his coming suffering and death. Peter rebukes him for talking like this. Jesus’ words don’t conform with Peter’s expectations. Having so recently made an apparent statement of faith in Jesus, Peter now undermines him. And Jesus responds with those famous words: “Get behind me Satan”.
Now, I don’t want you misunderstanding this. Jesus wasn’t referring to Peter as a demonic personification of evil when he used that word. “Satan” literally means “adversary”. Peter was simply being adversarial, working against Jesus. There’s no deeper connotation involved.
It was easy for those closest to Jesus to misunderstand him because of their own hopes and values. Given the distance of time, the layers of history and interpretation, and very different cultures and social norms – how much more likely is it that we can misunderstand him too? That we can remake Jesus to suit our needs and preferences.
Christianity has been used to support all kinds of different – and harmful – causes. There’s an internet meme circulating at the moment which addresses the rising influence of nationalistic, political religion in the U.S. - where referring to the actual teachings of Jesus is dismissed as “woke” or left wing. It pictures a frustrated Jesus with the words: “Strange times. Atheists are having to explain to Christians what Jesus actually preached.”
I asked earlier if there are parts of the Bible you have trouble understanding. I suspect quite a few of us misunderstand Paul’s letters. For instance, his letter to the Romans is very confusing!
He uses a rhetorical method common in the Roman world but applies it to the Hebrew scriptures in a way that many would find confounding. Sometimes he seems to write the same thing two or more times to explain himself – in very long, meandering sentences – and contradict himself. Sometimes I wonder if he even knew himself what he was writing!
In today’s reading from Romans 12, however, Paul is being very careful to avoid any misunderstanding. Having written long theological arguments he now provides straightforward instructions on how to live as followers of Jesus. They're binary black and white in their simplicity. And you can almost hear echoes of Jesus. We might even sense a similarity to passages like the Sermon on the Mount.
“Let love be genuine; hate what is evil, hold fast to what is good … Rejoice in hope, be patient in suffering, persevere in prayer... extend hospitality to strangers. Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them ... Do not repay anyone evil for evil but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all... so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” Paul also describes something that underlies these practices.
One thing I didn’t mention earlier about black and white photography is that you need to retrain the eye and mind to see in black and white. To transform how you look at things, and what you look for. We’re so used to the world of colour that we can overlook the nuances, details and contrast that black and white brings out. That’s why I sometimes set my camera to a black and white viewing mode. It helps me see a different, black and white world through my lens.
Paul writes in verses 1 and 2. “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God.” He is talking about changing the way we look at the world, using a different mode of thinking – hopefully avoiding the trap Peter fell into when he misunderstood Jesus.
There’s a simple, traditional practise that can assist that transformation. It’s to ask two questions twice a day, if you can: in the middle of the day, say around lunchtime … or just before an afternoon nap; and at the end of the day, around bedtime. You can do it sitting quietly, or as you go about your day. If you can’t manage it twice a day, doing so at bedtime is still good.
Look back over your day and ask yourself: What moved me closer to God; and what moved me away from God? The second part isn’t to make you feel guilty. It’s about building awareness. Don’t worry if you forget to do it sometimes. But maybe reflect on what led you to forgetting. There could be something useful in that. And if you get the hang of it, try it for 6 weeks. That’s how long it takes to create a new habit.
That brings us full circle back to the childlike observation that our church looks like a castle. Is that really such a bad thing? Did the local kindie kids really misunderstand our church? In all the best stories about castles, they’re wondrous places of imagination, noble values, high ideals, inspiration, celebration, protection, forgiveness, service, storytelling, and hospitality.
I’d be pretty happy if people looked at us and saw those things.